this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60253 readers
440 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just found this project by browsing the mergerfs documentation. It claims to be an opensource fork of the Unraid software that makes it so flexible. The documentation isn't great, but has all the basic info to get going. It works kinda like Snapraid in that each disk has it's own filesystem and parity is calculated across all of the drives, but it happens in real time (unlike with snapraid).

Thoughts? comments? Would you trust this with important data?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is the gain compared to running something battle tested like zfs or mdraid?

[–] dont@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The selling point of unraid is that you can mix and match different disk sizes and it figures out a (good, efficient?) way to handle them even as you grow a pool. You're not going to have a good time with a 1TB drive, a 2 TB drive and a 15 TB drive using zfs, unraid doesn't care... (Using and preferring zfs myself, by the way; this is heresay.)

[–] nickiam2@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago

Another benefit is if you lose your all parity disks and a data disk, you can still access the filesystem on the other data disks. So if the array fails, you don't lose all the data, just the 1 (failed) disk worth of files.

[–] lime_red@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] dont@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

How long did it take to get zpool-attach? I will not join the waiting list 😉

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Ah, I can see the appeal but it's not for me then. :)