26
‘Alien corpses’ shown to Mexican Congress
(www.independent.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
26 points (81.0% liked)
UFOs
2689 readers
1 users here now
This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.
Rules
- Be your own moderator
- Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
- If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
- Be Civil
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
- No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing.
- No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
- Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
- Avoid duplicate posts
- Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
- Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
- For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Mr. Maussen is the same guy that found some mummies in Peru, claimed they were alien and it was proven to be mummified children. I wouldn't get too excited by this. If 30% of retrieved DNA was unidentifiable, then 70% was. Not an expert but unidentified genomes are likely to be a result of divergent evolution and/or simply a result of a chemical breakdown over time.
I'd put my money on this guy having a real knack for finding dead kids.
Absolutely, 30% unidentifiable DNA still means there's 70% identifiable DNA. I still thought it's interesting as The Independent is not a small news outlet and they actually have pictures and without being an expert at all, I find those quite intriguing. Might still be just misshapen human skeletons, I'm actually pretty sure that's what these are. But still, interesting :)
Even if these are an alternate evolution path I think it's pretty exciting. The results presented by the teams investigating this sound pretty convincing, so I don't think it's just "misidentified human children".
@DisappointingIntro @j4yt33 Ugh! It's been proven! NOT ALIENS!!!
We have 90% of our DNA in common with mushrooms.
So a being where its DNA is only 70% similar to us (or whatever that "unindentifiable" means) should be vastly different from any lifeform on Earth.
Therefore, human-like aliens, LOL
I've done sequencing and the unidentifiable dna is just stuff that didn't map back to the human genome. For old samples, this is because dna doesn't preserve too well and you end up with super short reads that are too small to map. The computer kicks those out as "unidentifiable". So not "new genes" just chaff from poorly preserved material.
Absolutely, it doesn't mean that 70% of their DNA is like ours and 30% is something completely different or that 30% of their DNA is still DNA but with a different code to ours or anything like that. They could match 70% of it to known sequences and 30% to nothing, that's all that this means.
I have no idea about this, but say you tried to get DNA from Egyptian mummies, reckon you would be able to identify more than 70%?
Cool if it's true, but I'm sceptical
That’s not how genetics works.
Why would aliens have DNA at all? Why would it match our genetic code in any way? Maybe DNA happens to be something really special that even life on another planet would convetgently evolve, but the genetic code is arbitrary. There are even species on earth that use slightly different codons. The idea of alien species sharing any identifiable genes with humans is pretty silly.