Science

6900 readers

108 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

192

Believing misinformation is a “win” for some people, even when proven false (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/science@mander.xyz

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The strongest predictor of whether someone believed in COVID-19-related misinformation and risks related to the vaccine was whether they viewed COVID-19 prevention efforts in terms of symbolic strength and weakness. In other words, this group focused on whether an action would make them appear to fend off or “give in” to untoward influence.

[…]

Our findings highlight the limits of countering misinformation directly, because for some people, literal truth is not the point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Focus on material arguments, find common ground on the basis of class upon which to make such arguments. Only make them if needed. We don't need to have high degree of conformity and we're not gonna get it either way. And all of this should be anchored to a purpose for doing it. E.g. fighting the oligarchy, reaching better alignment within a family, etc. If there's no worthy purpose, we shouldn't expend social capital in convincing people.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Aligning on a purpose is important. I'd argue that being aware of how on board people are for that purpose is important too. I recently tried to say that the family chat should have less influencer posts since we don't all agree on the positions and it causes friction. Boy was that a shit show