this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
99 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

1126 readers
130 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The justices did not comment on their order, which they issued without even asking the families of the Sandy Hook victims to respond to Jones’ appeal. An FBI agent who responded to the shooting also sued.

Jones filed for bankruptcy in late 2022, and his lawyers told the justices that the “plaintiffs have no possible hope of collecting” the entire judgment.

He is separately appealing a $49 million judgment in a similar defamation lawsuit in Texas after he failed to turn over documents sought by the parents of another Sandy Hook victim.

In the Connecticut case, the judge issued a rare default ruling against Jones and his company in late 2021 because of what she called Jones’ repeated failure to abide by court rulings and to turn over certain evidence to the Sandy Hook families. The judge convened a jury to determine how much Jones would owe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago

Please relax with the whataboutism. Just because the SCOTUS is still a despicably corrupt institution doesn't mean that it's not a good thing that they're refusing to coddle the fascist in this one case.

Conversely, just because people are rightly pleased with this development doesn't mean that they'll all forget everything else they know about the Roberts court unless you hasten to remind them at length.