Selfhosted

60366 readers

568 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Best Synology Replacement? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 9 months ago by ramble81@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have a DS220+, which frankly I love, but I’m looking to replace it soon. It only has 2 drives, Synology is pulling some fuckery with needing their branded drives and I’m staying on the 6.x firmware given what I’ve seen/heard with 7.x

All that being said, I’m trying to find something that is:

At least 4 bays
Small form factor (it shouldn’t be much bigger than the drives it’s holding)
Capable of running Docker
Capable of backing up to an S3 bucket
Capable of backing up Windows Clients
Habe a decent GUI (I can do CLI, but frankly, don’t want to)

I was thinking potentially QNAP, but didn’t know what else is out there. I really do like Synology and would have looked at one of their models but their vendor lock in move ticked me off. Maybe finding a used 420 or 920?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are there any security concerns that this is a Chinese company?

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

Ugreen NAS support other OS. You could put TrueNAS or Proxmox on there, so no, there's no security concerns (beyond all computer hardware being partly manufactured there in some way).

[–] moeman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Personally, I’ve considered this, and there a few shoddy scripts running on it (the networking setup is terrible; and the script even has variable names in Chinese), but that aside I’m not sure whether that’s of any more of a concern than with any other proprietary manufacturer‘s OS (eg Cisco et al).

And as other people have said, you can literally throw any other distribution on it and it’s just “dumb” hardware.. so I would consider the risk fairly low