212
Statue of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands mysteriously reappears on National Mall
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
212 points (97.3% liked)
news
151 readers
586 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is where I lose the plot. Someone in charge saw the request to put up a statue of epstein, and said "Well this seems like a plan I can trust!"
Wat???
Protest art on the national mall isn't a new thing. So I'm not sure why it surprising that a bureaucrat did their job when presented with a legal request?
It's possible the president will be a giant man baby and order it removed again, but that doesn't really have anything to do with the request and approval process.
Yeah, they probably have a list of rules like 'Is it obscene?', 'Is it hazardous?' etc and stuff that doesn't tick any boxes gets the okay.
Freedom of speech is a wildly misunderstood concept to a lot of people.
Okay but as a non-american this is a reasonable response. Trumps shitstorm is seeping into every little crack in the government and youre telling me they approved an epstien and trump statue? Kinda wild if you ask me.
Im surprised Trump doesn’t find and fire this bureaucrat.
1st amendment. It's not in good taste (or is absolutely so, depending on your POV), but it's not inherently inappropriate for public view. I'm more surprised it was allowed back, though, since this admin would absolutely fire the entire team that approved the permit the first time.