this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
79 points (97.6% liked)
Privacy
3105 readers
404 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You already need some kind of proof of identity to work and housing. This just designates one identifier as the one you have to use. Hardly different.
Yes, as i said, different in scope not type.
Well that just seems silly. You're ok with an inconvenient ad-hoc collection of mandatory IDs, but not a unified one.
i'm not particularly enthused about either, but if you'll read my original reply you can find out why i dislike the new one specifically.
hint it's not really because of the id itself