MTG

2406 readers

14 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

andrew@mtgzone.com

mike@mtgzone.com

[Humor] Report: Wizards Got Soul Stone in Spider-Man Set By Sacrificing Half of Prerelease Attendance | Commanders Herald (commandersherald.com)

submitted 4 months ago by mike@mtgzone.com to c/mtg@mtgzone.com

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"So now we have to come up with a Through the Omenpaths equivalent, like a rock on Bloomburrow or some shit, have R&D look into that"

They're both rocks. One just has more art of it.

What I can't get over is that they don't even have the same subtypes. How? Why? It's not like Marvel owns a trademark on the word "infinity" right?

[–] mike@mtgzone.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wow I actually never noticed that until now. That's kinda odd for the game too, they kinda have to have the same rules and type/subtype for it to work. I don't know how the rules fully work, but it could be that they're both "stones" and Infinity/Terminus is an adjective or something. I have no clue what is going on anymore.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

My guess is the subtypes are "Infinity Stone" (one subtype) and "Terminus Stone" (another single subtype), where either name refers to the same thing.

Multi-word subtypes have been a thing for a short while though ever since "Time Lord" (and maybe earlier, but all I can think of is "Assembly-Worker").

Edit: they are separate subtypes. See below.