this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
36 points (84.6% liked)

Communism

9958 readers
5 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml
AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
36
Gender Abolitionism is Inherently Transphobic (en.prolewiki.org)
submitted 1 week ago by CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml to c/communism@lemmygrad.ml
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am unfortunately not at a point yet where I can write my own additions to this piece but I wanted to start venturing into gender and gender roles because there are a lot of marxists who repeat, no doubt because it seems to make sense on the surface, that gender is a social construct or that it should be abolished. A lot of it is Butlerian in nature and I highly recommend Leslie Feinberg who was positioned against the butlerian view of gender.

The sense of self is completely omitted in the Butlerian view of gender (as a performance), in that as a (cis) man if I acted (performed) like a woman and put on women's clothes, then that theory states I would be a woman. But I would not feel like one, because I know I'm not a woman. And if I lived in a false reality that forced me act like a man all my life from childhood to the point that I also believed I was a man (say in the same way you can make someone believe the sky is red if you berate them enough), then what explains that trans people specifically are able to "break out" of this mold? A lot of common (in marxist circles) feminist theory is unfortunately completely dismissive of trans people, trans men especially - if gender is a construct to pit oppressors and oppressed then why would anyone "choose" to be part of the oppressed group? Everyone ought to perform as men if that were the case. As for gender abolitionism, the author makes the case in their essay :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CountryBreakfast@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 week ago

I usually think of gender abolition as absurd. Sometimes it is brought up and I have no clue who it is supposed to help or how its abolition can even make coherent theoretical sense. Imo it sounds radical but is often just nonsense to say that gender exists because of oppressive human systems.

It reminds me of the "masculinity is a prison" line that is repeated, yet isn't it the goal for many trans men to be sentenced to this prison? I know gender is potentially quite an unpleasant "prison" to be in even for cis folks due to oppressive systems, but isn't there risk of much greater harm in being misrecognized or being targeted as non-compliant?

But it's not all completely absurd I suppose even if it is not how I think it is best said. I feel as if it is possible for the same gendered aspects to elicit both a feeling of gender euphoria and a sense of resentment depending on how human systems work.

Certain aspects of masculinity give me a strong sense of self, but the same aspects can become a prison if I'm not allowed to perform differently. Imo the fun parts about gender are soiled in this way and thus gender can be used against us. If we remove or reform the unrelenting pressures that exist in our respective cultures then perhaps in some way we have "abolished" gender, but really it actually seems liberated via revolution.