Selfhosted

51572 readers

248 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

What is the easiest way to have a self hosted git server? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago by ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been recently dabbling on rust, and I am have been mostly doing that on my laptop. However, I also have a desktop and once in a while I would like to resume my stuff from the laptop, but without manual file transfers.

I know git by design does this, but I would like to use my current docker setup with Ubuntu server to have a very simple git server.

What would be the simplest git server to have in this situation? Keep in mind I am not planning to expose none of this to the internet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Check out Gitea. It was pretty easy to set up with docker and they have pretty decent docs.

[–] artiman@piefed.social 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

gitea has been replaced by forgejo

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

You are correct, and I am still a bit sad about it, because gitea was a cuter name and logo TBH. But Forgejo is pursuing a technically superior design and socially better path at this point.

[–] TehNomad@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think Forgejo is a community-driven fork of Gitea. Gitea development is still active.

[–] artiman@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

forgejo is implementing federation and gitea is not https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/ if you dont care that its community based, federation is the only thing i could tell you

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love federation, but why does a git server need federation? Am I missing something, or is this federating for the sake of federating?

[–] artiman@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

You can make like a account on Codeberg and open issues on other git servers it's not useful for developers it's user friendly why is UX bad in your opinion?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Look at the number of commits

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Churn != Improvement

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Not necessarily

Notice Forgejo is being hosted on Forgejo. The community behind it is much stronger while Gitea is some startup that is desperately trying to be relevant.

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why is that? The project still seems to be available / updating

[–] artiman@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

it's been forked Into forgejo a community driven fork if you don't care that they are community based, they are also implementing federation