[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3520 readers

3 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

PugJesus@lemmy.world

PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com

303

I'm out of words... (feddit.org)

submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/historymemes@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Human vision is wider than it is tall. It makes sense for screens to reflect this fact. 180° horizontally and 100° verticaly.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So, way closer to 4/3 like old standard screens than to 16/9 like the screens nobody even calls "wide" anymore?

[–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Can you show the math behind?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Now that the numbers on the original post changed, no, it's not closer anymore.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Now imagine a display 24" wide and one pixel high.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Widescreen format has a width/height ratio of 1.78, human vision has a width/height ratio of 1.8.

Why would you want a screen that isn't somewhat close to the same ratio as your vision? Your one pixel tall screen is quite far off from the ratio of human vision.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago

"wide screens" != "widescreen". I'm merely demonstrating that distinction with an extreme example.