this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
95 points (86.3% liked)

LemmyToday

238 readers
1 users here now

If you experience issues or problems with this instance (lemmy.today), this is the place to discuss them. Or if you just want to ask questions about how something works. Anything related to the instance or lemmy itself.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
mrmanager@lemmy.today
95
The White House is Using AI to create Trump's Charlie Kirk speech. His pinky disappears at 0:18 seconds! (youtu.be)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Wolf@lemmy.today to c/lemmytoday@lemmy.today
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At 18 seconds into this speech Trumps Pinky disappears under his hand and his ring finger 'becomes' his pinky. This is clearly AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’ve outlined everything in the other thread. You’re not going to change your mind, I’ve had hundreds of conversations with people like you before. You can’t be convinced or admit you’re wrong. But maybe (I hoped) you could be persuaded to change your post title.

The upvotes are what people see. It give this exposure and spreads wrong information. Factually proven wrong information. If you want a discussion that’s fine. That’s what Lemmy is for. What you’re doing is disingenuous by posting a post title with 100% certainty and a link to an ABC video making it sound like a news organisation said this.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You’re not going to change your mind, I’ve had hundreds of conversations with people like you before. You can’t be convinced or admit you’re wrong. But maybe (I hoped) you could be persuaded to change your post title.

I definitely could be persuaded to change my mind- but I'm certainly not going to do it just because some rando with an agenda who claims to be an expert and tells me that it's so with no proof.

Factually proven wrong information.

You haven't factually proven anything, and that is a fact.

a link to an ABC video making it sound like a news organisation said this.

What kind of moron would conclude that because of my post title, the video which has a completely different title and makes no such claim agrees with me? That makes zero sense.