this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
95 points (86.3% liked)

LemmyToday

238 readers
1 users here now

If you experience issues or problems with this instance (lemmy.today), this is the place to discuss them. Or if you just want to ask questions about how something works. Anything related to the instance or lemmy itself.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At 18 seconds into this speech Trumps Pinky disappears under his hand and his ring finger 'becomes' his pinky. This is clearly AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At the same time as the hand glitch, the window glitches above to be different. Someone in another thread mentioned a heavy AI filter on him. I think I agree with that. If you speed up the video and no sound, you can see his mouth is obviously fake. It's probably to hide the stroke, mouth droop.

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

There is such a thing as stroke hand. Ironically, it looks like when he was making fun of the disabled journalist.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hijacking top post again, to point out the red flags

  • 🚩OP posted ABC official video with custom made post title to suit his narrative
  • 🚩OP used a software AI detector (made by AI unbeknownst to them) to tell that this video is ~70% chance of being AI, not their own expertise or critical thinking
  • 🚩 OP is misdirecting the audience by making them focus on a specific part to support their narrative instead of letting the video speak for itself.
  • 🚩 all the anomalies happen around the 0:19 timestamp. The blur in the tree leaves in the window, the face/mouth movement and the hands. Occam’s razor would tell you this is a classic cross dissolve.

There’s no such thing as an AI filter on this. It’s plain old video editing. He misspoke as I explained below.

I want this guy gone and out of our lives as much as the next guy, but if we lose our critical thinking skills and will begin with these herd upvote stampedes without even considering OP might be trying to steer the narrative, we lose a lot of credibility with potential (new high quality) users.

This seems to be posted on a fringe instance on a poorly moderated community, hence me going hard against this, as I don’t think reporting this post with help. So please downvote this post.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

There is an “AI powered” cross dissolve that can be done to hide jump cuts in long takes.

Google “Morph Cut in Premiere Pro”

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is a pretty assinine take

  • you're not rebutting this.
  • does this program work or not? You're making an ad hominem attack rather providing any insight into whether this detector is or is not effective or why
  • op is offering supporting evidence for their position. Is this evidence valid or not? What the fuck does "let the video speak for itself" mean? If you don't agree with evidence argument with your own
  • occam's razor states that the simpelst explanation is usually the correct one. It is a broadly applicable maxim to help one think critically. If this is or is not a cross dissolve then show fucking evidence. Make arguments.

Jfc

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're fighting hard against a well reasoned set of points. The only evidence possible here is looking at it with your eyes.

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This isn't what reason looks like. Reason is supported by arguments and evidence.

And your reading comprehension is truly awful if you think I'm fighting for anything. These are not well reasoned points. I am not arguing against them or for them, I am not arguing for the op or against the op.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Lol sure thing

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have in the other comment thread. This is an echo chamber where people are clearly not open to factual discussion.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This is a classic cross dissolve