this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
586 points (95.8% liked)

pics

24815 readers
679 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are dedicated stretcher bearers to take them away.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

you do realize that there being dedicated stretcher bearers makes it about a hundred times worse, right?

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dedicated medical personnel is bad?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

that ain't my argument, and you know it, you twatwaffle.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intentionally putting a large number of people in a position that they are likely to pass out from heat exhaustion isn't normally considered a good thing...

Especially, when it's because it "looks cool". And your response to this knowledge, isn't to change putting them in that situation, but dedicate people to picking them up and getting them out of sight.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

if they knew what they were signing up for, why shouldn't the employer be allowed to use harm mitigation rather than improve safety ?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what in the late stage capitalist neo-liberal bullshit is this?

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

omg you were being satirical, weren't you?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is exactly the capitalist excuse a lot of employers use until someone gets seriously hurt or dies.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They are allowed, and we are allowed to think they are shitty for treating other humans that way.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does? Any moderately large and well organised public gathering in Britain would have at least one set of paramedics on standby. Is that so terrible?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

idk, is it terrible to put people in danger for the vain narcissism of an anachronistic figure of government? I suppose the answer depends on how much of a bootlicker you are.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Surely the bootlicker would be the one worrying about soldiers stubbing a toe or whatever.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

no, cause they have dedicated toe stubbing medics on hand!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, a wild Uhm, akshully appears!

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

hey, a wild nonce supporter appears!