this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
9 points (80.0% liked)

news

101 readers
124 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
kebab@endlesstalk.org
9
‘Pregnancy robots’ could give birth to human children in revolutionary breakthrough — and a game-changer for infertile couples (nypost.com)
submitted 1 week ago by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/news@endlesstalk.org
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Going through nine months of growing a life inside of you is a vastly different context than signing paperwork to form a bond under.

There is a different context for a child who is with their biological parents(s) than an adopted child and their parent(s) to develop under.

What's the relevance of pointing out the different context, since we've already determined it doesn't actually relate to how much the parent loves their kid or vice versa?

Parent-child bonding

Again, see above.

countless generations have developed inside of their mother and being divorced from that biological condition removes countless stimuli

Is there any reason to believe we could not replicate said stimuli and conditions if we needed to?