this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
878 readers
261 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ground-based drone defense can be achieved either by electronic attack, which uses radio-frequency jammers to overwhelm the drone’s control and GPS signals, or by directed energy weapons, such as high-power microwave systems that emit concentrated electromagnetic bursts to overload and destroy the drone’s onboard electronics, rendering it inoperable mid-flight.
Creating such weapons in a compact form that be mounted on a vehicle or building or handheld 🤞 would give civilians an edge over police drones. Theoretically these devices could be made with common parts without drawing attention, or being prohibitively expensive.
I just have a thing for lidar and lasers. somebody recently made something similar for anti mosquito purposes. When I start thinking about microwave my brain goes to search and rescue applications. I bet there's a way that we can find the vital signs of buried patients for triage reasons. i cannot wait to get to school
Edit* ideally I'll do it without cooking the patient. But if it comes down to you being rescued or being cooked a little bit what do you think you'll prefer? Lidar might be a better idea for this