108
submitted 1 year ago by zhunk@beehaw.org to c/space@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aeternum@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

the federal department charged with analyzing how efficiently US taxpayer dollars are spent,

lmao. what a joke.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago
[-] stevecrox@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The GAO has performed an annual review of the Space Launch System every year since 2014 and switched to reviewing the Artemis program in 2019.

Each year the GAO points out Nasa isn't tracking any costs and Nasa argues with the GAO about the costs they assign. Then the GAO points out Nasa has no concrete plan to reduce costs, Nasa then goes nu'uh (see the articles cost reduction "objectives").

The last two reports have focused on the RS-25 engine, last time the GAO was unhappy because an engine cost Nasa $100 million and Nasa had just granted a development contract to reduce the cost of the engine.

However if you took the headline cost of the contract and split it over planned engines it was greater than the desired cost savings. Nasa response was development costs don't count.

Congress reviews GAO reports and decides to give SLS more money.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

they're wasting money like nobody's business.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
108 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7242 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS