this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
697 points (98.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

36451 readers
961 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the late 2000s there was a push by a lot of businesses to not print emails and people use to add a 'Please consider this environment before printing this email.'

Considering how bad LLMs/'ai' are with power consumption and water usage a new useless tag email footer should be made.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

you need to generate about 2 million emails (using qwen) for the carbon emission of one transatlantic flight, personal use is definitely not the power hungry shit you imagine

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am a small part of the problem, so I am not a problem.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

i don't know what amount of energy and water LLM's or image generation use, but you vastly overestimate it if you react like this.

If you don't have your screen on power save after 15 seconds of non-use, rethink it - 8 minutes of screen time assuming a 30W monitor equals about 1 ChatGPT request, and that's including the training of the model and the production of the hardware it's running on.

If it cost any real amount of money, don't you think that people would have to pay for that? ChatGPT has 400m users, and only 11m actually pay for it.

E: Something else to set into relation: Charging your phone for about 40 minutes using slow charging (5W) is one request. Water use? 10-25ml water per request - a 500ml bottle lasts you 20-50 questions.

Gaming? ChatGPT uses the energy of 20000 households (not bad for serving 400m users and around 1b requests/day). Fortnite alone uses more than 400000 households, and noone preaches into my ear to stop playing fortnite because it's bad for the climate. (and i don't play fortnite lol)

I never had a car, i have flown 4 times in my life, i rarely eat meat. I can generate 10000 requests per day if i cared to and wouldn't have a chance reaching even the basic wastefulness that a american household is.

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The same as every new service over the past 20 years. Start with free, then when they're hooked add the advertising, paywalls and ramp up the enshitification to the Max. You need to grab market share with a loss leader, dominate and become the defacto standard before you turn your users into money providers.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But even with a loss leader you cannot crank up the price stupidly high if the costs per request were prohibitive; ChatGPT subscriptions cost 20$/month. API pricing for the most expensive option is 10k$/1Million Tokens, so it's a buck per 100 tokens.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

an AI center in Texas was using 460 Million gallons of water, so much that residents were told to cut back on showering to accommodate it.

Yeah, it's stupid that they built it where it's not supported by the necessary infrastructure. btw, do you know what happens after they use it to cool the servers? it gets placed back into the river, it doesn't disappear. this situation is an infrastructure issue, not an AI issue.

[–] sourhill@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

This post linked elsewhere in the thread was pretty insightful.

load more comments (8 replies)