this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
81 points (95.5% liked)

Space

1640 readers
81 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Well that's dumb. Solar power during the very long day could power operations and charge batteries for ops during the long night. Trump's admin is so anti-renewables that they'd rather build a nuke plant than take advantage of solar. I'm only surprised they aren't trying to figure out how to build a coal plant up there.

[–] cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

A small reactor like what we use in submarines or our aircraft carriers would probably be the best tool for the job on the moon. They are small and require minimal maintenance (within their fairly long lifespan) and they produce enormous amounts of power.

How much weight in solar panels would it take to produce what a reactor could?

Would a single panel on the moon last more than 20 years?

How do we decommission panels on the moon?

(forgot about batteries)... all of these things IDEALLY will come back down to Earth some day so the fewer things we put on the moon in the first place the better

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And we can just shoot the spent fuel into the sun!

[–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's more efficient to launch it out of the solar system. Less Ξ”v required.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Imagine being the first alien civilization to find remnants of ancient human culture in space, and it's a cancerous death rock screaming radiation... Haha

load more comments (8 replies)