this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
43 points (86.4% liked)

Linux

9310 readers
744 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

reject POSIX, embrace nushell

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fish isn't POSIX...

That said, I tried nushell a couple times and it's pretty cool. Just a big hurdle for right now.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, but they did reverse course on ; and vs && to be more POSIX compatible, which is a decision i understand but don’t agree with

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, where did you hear that? I'm reading the manual through relevant parts but I can't find anything regarding those combiners and POSIX compliancy.

Do you have a link perhaps?

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

it was years ago. they used to not support &&, but they added it so people could paste commands into the terminal

i think this is the PR from 8 years ago 👴: https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/4620

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Love the pragmatic discourse in that issue. The suggestion is also really well formulated. Bravo to everyone involved.

[–] LPThinker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah nushell! Truly a life-changing upgrade.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Porque no los dos?