this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
askchapo
23107 readers
305 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At the height of BLM protests their scepticism about the movement's ability to change anything outside of destroying a couple of statues was considered outrageous, but now, looking back, seems like they've been vindicated.
I will say this as someone who was theoretically on the ground in Minneapolis, is that the movement lacked any real coherency or organization with labor or other leftist movements. It had the strength of being grassroots and spontaneous, and the weakness of being grassroots and spontaneous. While I wouldn't say it was a bad thing, it certainly wasn't going to be a change in the status quo and the narrative around it was far too disjointed to have a meaningful impact on anyone but the local community members involved, many of whom are arrested with extraordinary long sentences hanging over their heads. It was a good call very grounded in historicity and actual analysis, something they learned from the loss around Bernie.
Overall having Taibbi and Amber on was weird choice and I wasn't a big fan, but I mostly just skipped that.