this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
182 points (93.3% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

3141 readers
14 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its a shame because they're prominent voice on lemmy. Good on the admins for not tolerating this. I don't understand the point of targeting a person you don't like on the internet just because they said something that upset you and spamming their post with downvotes. If you don't like someone block their ass and be done with it. I agree with the perspective that its harassment (and an incredibly petty ineffective form of it at that)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

How did dbzer0 pick literally the most helpful and drama-free of all possible Lemmy users to ban? As far as I can tell, literally the only thing the dude does is post about cool stuff and chat. I didn't even know he was active as a moderator in any real capacity.

hmm now I'm curious

>checks

AHAHAHAHA no. Funny, but no. I have that dude blocked, I can't remember exactly why but I've had him blocked for at least a year and I remember his username and him being a twat, I just don't care enough to go looking up how he was a twat.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago (7 children)

AHAHAHAHA no. Funny, but no.

Can I do that too? I mean, I have enough respect for the people reading my stuff to explain why I think things so they can think it over, see if it makes sense, I mean they're free to agree or disagree but I guess I was wasting my time with that when AHAHAHAHAHA means obviously I'm right and the other person is wrong...

I can't remember exactly why but I've had him blocked for at least a year and I remember his username and him being a twat

Okay. Who are you? Why do I take your opinion about him seriously just because you say it and actively refuse to give any reason?

[–] archonet@lemy.lol -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

You can have whatever opinion about the guy you want, I was just offering that I've had personal experience with someone you classify as "the most helpful and drama-free" being anything but, and if he got banned he probably deserved it. I'm very sorry I don't feel like digging through every comment I've/he's ever written to go and remember exactly why I think he's an obnoxious dickhead, all I can remember is that I've interacted with him, and he was enough of an obnoxious dickhead to justify blocking him. You're welcome to go do so if you don't believe me.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah what was I thinking looking up his modlog, quoting some of the stuff that got him banned, and weighing in on it and specifically why. I should have just said I liked him, and "if he got banned, he probably didn't deserve it" all confident-like, and called it a day. It's easier, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)