this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
182 points (98.9% liked)

Games

20707 readers
515 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The main problem is that those reviews are still included in the overall review score. I think you can filter out low play time but that's an extra step most won't take (because they shouldn't need to)

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago

People who review games poorly are unlikely to play them for long though. How would you filter them as not to drop most legit negative reviews?

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

would you prefer the platform police it and run into the problem that the google play store/ios app store has about vote manipulation? and purging several reviews (whether legitamate or not)

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Steam already does stuff similar to this? Reviews flagged as "suspicious" aren't deleted but aren't included in the overall score instead, and a notice is put next to the overall score when this happens. The same is true for reviews made by people who got the game with a key.

Why not extend this? Like you said, most bots have low play time, valve could exclude (but not delete) reviews with low play time. I agree that doing something like this is a slippery slope towards mobile app store reviews but if it's done right then it is a net positive.