Politics

878 readers

275 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

126

“It’s a heist”: Senator calls out Texas for trying to steal shuttle from Smithsonian (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 month ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"In the reconciliation bill, Texas entered $85 million to move the space shuttle from the National Air and Space Museum in Chantilly, Virginia, to Texas. Eighty-five million dollars sounds like a lot of money, but it is not nearly what's necessary for this to be accomplished," Durbin said.

Citing research by NASA and the Smithsonian, Durbin said that the total was closer to $305 million and that did not include the estimated $178 million needed to build a facility to house and display Discovery once in Houston.

Furthermore, it was unclear if Congress even has the right to remove an artifact, let alone a space shuttle, from the Smithsonian's collection. The Washington, DC, institution, which serves as a trust instrumentality of the US, maintains that it owns Discovery. The paperwork signed by NASA in 2012 transferred "all rights, interest, title, and ownership" for the spacecraft to the Smithsonian.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, Houston did not receive one of the four space shuttles for public display when the shuttle program ended in 2011, which was sort of a raw deal.

I don't think they won the bid, isn't Texas all about pulling up their bootstraps and going for it?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don’t think they won the bid

There was no bid. These were given out to Congressional Reps in exchange for their support of the Obama Era economic aid packages.

isn’t Texas all about pulling up their bootstraps and going for it?

No. Texas is about taking enormous subsidies from the government to not grow alfalfa, to not drill for oil, and to not build a wall on the southern border. Then we spend the rest of the day complaining that we're not as popular as California.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What was the competition then? I assumed it was a bid.

"This is not a transfer. It's a heist," said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) during a budget markup hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee. "A heist by Texas because they lost a competition 12 years ago."

[+] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Blaming Obama, really? lmao

Museums interested in exhibiting NASA's space shuttle orbiters after they're retired in 2010 may need to meet certain requirements set by the space agency on Wednesday, including the ability to underwrite upwards of $40 million in shipping and handling charges.

The prerequisites, which were outlined in a formal request for information posted on NASA's website, seek to insure that the orbiters are properly displayed, that they are used to "inspire the American public and students in particular" and if possible do so without burdening NASA with having to pay for the vehicles' preparation and transfer.

The fee per shuttle, which NASA estimates today will run $42 million (but cautions that the estimates are subject to change) are not for the vehicle itself, but the work needed before it is suitable for exhibition.

"It is really not selling the orbiter, it is the preparation," said NASA spokesman Michael Curie in an interview with collectSPACE, explaining that $28.2 million goes toward "safing" the orbiter, "which is primarily, removing all the hypergolic fuel systems and other environmental hazards from the shuttle," $8 million for making it ready for display and $5.8 million for ferrying it on NASA's modified Boeing 747 to an airport near the museum.

http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-121708a.html

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

From what I remember they were offered one but they already had the trainer still on the grounds, and didn’t have the money for new space or upkeep of that kind of artifact near the ocean when they already had a Saturn V. They are still building the space for the one in California.