this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
83 points (97.7% liked)
Stardew Valley
255 readers
2 users here now
Welcome to Stardew Valley Lemmy and Mbin Community.
This community is for the game Stardew Valley, which is developed and published by ConcernedApe. Feel free to post Arts, Question or Your farm. Also make sure you read our rules before posting.
Rules:
- 1: Treat all users with respect.
- 2: Posts must be related to the Stardew Valley
- 3: No advertising.
- 4: No piracy.
- 5: No NSFW or adult content.
- 6: Reddit reposts are allowed.
- 7: Use common sense.
- 8: No Sensetive or Political topics.
Official Links
Purchase Links
- Buy it for PC: GOG, Steam, or Humble
- Buy it for Console: PS4, Switch, Xbox One
- Buy it for mobile: iOS, Android
Tools and Resources
- Stardew Assistant
- Save Analyser
- Share Your Farms
- Farms Planner
- Stardew Name Generator
- Stardew Valley Fonts
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Probably used a red cross somewhere
https://steamcommunity.com/app/413150/discussions/0/3104564981118123491/ Yep, you are right.
In that thread: people who have no fucking clue about the difference between copyright and trademarks.
(I blame people who use the loaded language phrase "intellectual property[sic]".)
It seems that neither "copyright" nor "trademark" are necessary for this conversation.
At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protective_sign I found these sources:
It seems that https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ366/PLAW-109publ366.pdf is what is referenced by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006#cite_note-1
I assume that a country that does not enforce international law is more likely to be affected by UN peacekeeping operations, which probably makes enforcing international law vastly preferable: https://www.ibanet.org/article/CEBC5F69-A238-49BB-B85A-5E8D878FE485
The double edged sword of not understanding the difference between copyright and trademark, and not knowing what the Red Cross actually does. I've seen people argue that it's a good thing when games use the red cross to denote healing, because it trains people to recognize it as a healthcare symbol. The Red Cross does much, much more than provide healthcare...
Whether it’s copyright or trademark is completely inconsequential. The point of it is to stop people from diluting the meaning of the Red Cross, which literally gets members of it killed in conflicts.