this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
706 points (94.9% liked)

Political Memes

8113 readers
2893 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

I just want people to have food, shelter and healthcare at an affordable price.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Some call this “Leftist extremism”. =/

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh George Soros poisoned Progressivism!

By "affordable" I'm assuming you mean free. Always wanting a handout, of course.

I just want untaxed inheritance, corporate welfare on top of more tax breaks for me and all my friends, unregulated surveillance and data collection of the plebs so I can continue to make even more money (untaxed obvs), exclusive and elite private universities, and a justice system where I can live free of consequence and purchase a judge at a reasonable price because I believe in being fiscally conservative.

Food, shelter, and healthcare are things I've just never had to think about really. Although, I would also prefer that if too many people are worrying about those things in my immediate vicinity, they be shuffled around or forcibly moved to a different vicinity.

That way I don't have to start thinking too much. It's really unfair when that happens, because it starts to make me feel all kinds of uncomfortable. Uncomfortable is not something I'm used to feeling, and since I don't like to think about things, I never stop and think about why somebody else being uncomfortable would also make me feel so uncomfortable.

Logically, the solution is to just put those people somewhere not visible to me, and then complain about what society is "turning into these days" when they slip through the privilege perimeter.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

Due to Poe's Law, I think you really need one of these: /s

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So you want billionaires hoisted up by their figgins as a warning to the rest of the bourgeoisie?? That's what I'm hearing here.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think we should have a maximum wealth cap. Set it as an even 1000x the median annual household income. That is the type of money that even the most highly paid wage earners - like anesthesiologists, would struggle to amass if they worked overtime their whole careers, lived like paupers, and invested every penny they made. That would be about $80 million today. Anything above that would be taxed at 100%. And no, I don't give a shit about your $80 million "family farm."

But truly obscene levels of wealth? Like 10,000x median household income and above? If we had a wealth cap, and you evaded it, and secretly collected a fortune 10x the cap? A felony whose penalty is 20 to life.

We don't let people own atomic bombs. We don't require you to have an atomic bomb license, or only let really nice moral people own nuclear weapons. We simply don't let individuals own nuclear weapons, as the risk of such power in a single hand is simply too great.

And yet, we let people amass fortunes that they can use to do far more damage than any nuclear weapon. Someone like Musk or Bezos, completely on their own, can absolutely cause suffering and destruction on the level of a nuclear bomb.

No one should have that type of power. Period. That power should only be obtainable through free and fair elections. We need a maximum wealth cap. 1000x median household income. Having a billion dollars should be absurd as owning your own nuclear bomb.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

We don’t let people own atomic bombs [...] and yet, we let people amass fortunes that they can use to do far more damage than any nuclear weapon.

Damn that is very well put. I thought I knew where you were going with that analogy -- like that there are just some things we don't allow people to have. But the comparison of the power of a nuclear bomb and 11 digit wealth is really really good.

No matter what you do with that kind of wealth, it is a level of force that should not be wielded without the consent of the people it will affect.

[–] CtrlAltDefeat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What about people we don't like?

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Why don’t we like them? Is it because they are anti-social? That’s why we have laws. Is it because they are different? Then don’t be anti-social and learn to understand them.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Seems reasonable.