this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1228 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

10348 readers
556 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can we just get a bathroom design where they are a wall of stalls with a urinal and toilet inside and the hand washing station is on the outside without a door blocking the path? I hate bathroom doors after washing hands, especially when they don't have a way to open the doors without touching the handle. Just put the sinks outside the bathroom.

[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been to places with this layout.

Private stalls. Sinks and hand washing open and visible to the hallway. Nobody feels threatrned or uncomfortable.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nobody feels threatrned or uncomfortable

And that makes conservatives feel threatened and uncomfortable.

[–] troed@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No one needs urinals.

Case in point: No one has one in their home.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah but the toilet sitters do appreciate how much less urine is on the seats and around the bowl. I would have a urinal in my home if I was to remodel my bathroom. They are convenient.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

You can also just sit to pee, so that there's less urine on the seats and around the bowl. No need for a urinal, which also has splash back.

[–] troed@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago

If you splash urine all over the place when peeing you're sitting wrong.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Home bathrooms are single-occupancy, plus most people don't have the room. They're definitely beneficial for higher volume places as add much more capacity for less space, and act as an "express lane" of sorts.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

That's a bad argument. How many people have hundreds, maybe thousands of people using their toilet every hour? Urinals are made for high traffic areas, where large numbers of men need to pee, and they also save water by not needing to be flushed every time.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

There are people with urinals in their home though, although they are rare.