this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
346 points (92.2% liked)

Fediverse

23652 readers
20 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Isn't this just public information anyway, what's the problem with them taking it?

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, by design: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/methods/accounts/

IMO, the problem is not them taking the information per se, but in abusing that info to further the massive surveillance apparatus that harms society.

[–] ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

This and the constant lying while doing it!

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Public? Idk, maybe. I wouldn't generally consider my IP to username to be public. Comment and post stuff, sort of. But even if it's public, I still wouldn't want Meta consuming it.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t generally consider my IP to username to be public.

Are they talking about your IP address or the service's? Does ActivityPub even share the user's IP address with other nodes in the network? That'd be crazy, so I assume that it doesn't. Then Meta can't find out your IP address.

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Does ActivityPub even share the user's IP address with other nodes in the network?

No this is not in the specification.

A malicious instance could in theory distribute this information but it would be non-standard. Of the 2 systems I've studied - Mastodon and Lemmy - neither do this.

Are they talking about your IP address or the service's?

In this scenario they would be talking about the IP address(es) of the services.

[–] lolgcat@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks for the clarification. That claim seemed really off.

I've assumed that what you see publicly is basically what's synced. Obv. your instance can have a few more meta details on you, like IP, device info, possibly all the exif they've stripped from uploaded photos, but these things aren't in the ActivityPub outbox

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If a Threads user posts an image, and Meta hosts it, and I scroll through my feed and see it, my client will hit their server for said image. And Meta can collect my IP.

Meta basically invented this shit.

[–] chris@im.allmendenetz.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@MrScottyTay

Isn’t this just public information anyway, what’s the problem with them taking it?

wake up man...

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm wide awake, isn't this just the information transferred when federating? But they just have to put it into a TOS because they're an actual company with liability? I really don't see the issue with them having this information.

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They correlate the content of your posts with all the other data they have about you, taken from every app (besides WhatsApp, FB etc) that has FB trackers built in. Then that aggregated profile will be used with AdTech to serve ads and make money. I personally object to Meta making money with my personal data without me using their products.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's just how adtech works in general. Every ad company has a profile on who they think you are, well more technically a cohort of potential similar profiles. Also not all profiles can equated to a single person and a single person may have multiple. That's how wishy washy the whole tech is. It's good enough though. Way better than seeing those flashy "download these smiley trail mouse cursors" ads the old internet used to have. Still. I don't see the problem here, it's just about making ads more relevant to you. If you're not the kind to let ads sway you anyway than what's the big deal? And if you are the kind to be swayed at least they'll be actually relevant to what you're into.

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The big deal is I help others make money of me without my consent or getting something back in return. At least not usefull to me. On top of that they track the hell out of me with surveillance.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Because fuck them. This is step one of their 20 step plan to do evil shit.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Won't matter much in a democracy, but in a dictatorship or atcracy it means life & death.

In India, people have been imprisoned for posts & tweets for calling out Hindu supremacist Modi govt's anti-democratic policies & communal acts, Some of them have been violently assaulted in their homes by Hindu supremacist thugs for their posts and tweets because the dictatorial govt has stooges in both Meta & Twitter who access the ip address which is tracked down by the state.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What if my instance says other services and instances can't do that? Are meta then breaking the law?

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If your instance says nobody can fetch its messages that just means turning off federation

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can we put terms as to how the data is used / not used? Surely that could put an end to meta's dark move?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that should be possible, back it up with the GDPR as well.