this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
946 points (99.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19587 readers
138 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let's see how committed they are to "Free Speech". Bets on how long until Florida or D.C. bans these ads? (They'll call it "foreign interference").

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll call it "foreign interference"

Honestly it kind of is. Though in this case I'm all for it.

[–] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago

The precedent has been set. We are playing their game and these are their rules.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only foreign interference they can accept is israel's

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

And south african expats who south africa doesn't even want to associate with right now.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The First Amendment is gone.

Trump is openly retaliating against people who criticized him. Our constitution isn’t worth the crumbling paper it’s written on any more.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It never was, ignoring how it enshrined slavery, the system it built relied on people acting in good faith. The idea that elected officials would always work to preserve democracy.

Now it's evident that is not an appropriate system for checks and balances.

It has good parts and had a lot of bad parts. It was written centuries ago, so let’s take that framing into consideration. It was a worthwhile endeavor to pursue the good parts while amending the bad, directly or via modern courts. Unfortunately it’s been a backsliding battle against conservatives who selectively interpret it as “originalists”, like they selectively interpret their bible to enhance their power and pocketbook and ignore the parts that are inconvenient or get between them and money, and obstinately refuse change or would actively change it for the worse.

The most ironic part is that the countries that the US fought with in WW2 that had some absolutely awful leadership and governance were outfitted with relatively excellent frameworks to govern with postwar, Germany and Japan, while the US has been crippled with resting on its laurels and mulish refusal to take the lessons learned those endeavors to heart.