this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1438 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68772 readers
3358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1438
Multiple Tesla vehicles were set on fire in Las Vegas and Kansas City (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
249 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The other user elaborated to you on the importance of context

Which was unnecessary and irrelevant because the context was already established. That's called "derailing the conversation".

They challenged the definitions of violence.

No they didn't, they plainly agreed.

They didn't admit anything later, because their position remained the same throughout.

It clearly did not. They said that violence did not include property damage, then later admitted that it did. I don't know how you can claim they "challenged the definition of violence" without disagreeing that property damage is violence.