323
Three millennials buy abandoned high school, convert it into 31-unit housing
(www.goodgoodgood.co)
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
323 points (91.5% liked)
[migrated] Good News Everyone
1788 readers
1 users here now
#Community has migrated to !goodnewseveryone@piefed.social until further notice
A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!
Rules for now:
- posts must link from a reliable news source
- no reposts
- paywalled articles must be made available
- avoid politics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While this is wholesome, fuck this AI article. There's absolutely no human alive that would accidentally type cost instead of caused.
I watch confirmed humans type "should of" every fucking day.
I am humans lmao, I can see that. I feel like what I said is a bit more of a stretch, but from a proofreading/editors standpoint, it's not excusable.
Bonus story, in fifth grade, I had to write an essay and I swear to god I wrote "ov" instead of "of" and I had an internal battle about which it should be knowing damn well how to spell much more complex words. After I settled it, I could feel my ears get hot from the embarrassment of even having to deal with it. I wrote ov naturally, then just saw it in writing and was like no, there's no way. Then I erased it and wrote of, then thought no fucking way, there's no way they landed on 'f' for a 'v' sound.
English is and always will be German, French, and Spanish in a trenchcoat pretending to be one language.
You had wordnesia! It feels so weird when it happens :D
Neat. Thanks for that!
I concede. I just typed "I" instead of "eye" in a comment. U right.
It might be possible that a human dictated it and the speech-to-text program transcribed it that way; in most American accents those words are near perfect homophones. Still, -10 points for failure to proofread.
In fact, I'd assume a bot would be less likely to make a phonetic mistake than a person/
I started to say this in my previous comment, but on things like Youtube shorts, I've noticed the baked in subtitles they always have tend to be hilariously inaccurate, even if the video is using a text-to-speech program to read aloud something written on Tumblr or Reddit, so they had the text in the first place.. It does speech-to-text, then they run text-to-speech on that.
LLMs are trained on written text, and I don't think they would correctly innovate on misspelling. Someone else mentioned the "should of" mistake, which I can see an LLM doing, because it's a common mistake humans have made. "cost" instead of "caused" isn't commonly made by humans, so I don't think an LLM would just come up with it. STT software has been pulling that shit for 30 years now though.
Absolutely. STT is still hit and miss on YouTube.
Likely. I was thinking that too, but still sort of the same outcome. Journalism is dying a very public death.
You may be on to something. But yes, imagine your whole job is to read, rather than write/read/write/read and you still miss this and many others.