this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
373 points (98.2% liked)

Open Source

32747 readers
145 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Its not antithetical to the Foss philosophy. Thus happens because Linus is a trusted figure, something he's absolutely earned. He didn't just buy control of some product, or get promoted to this position by a company. Many great open source projects have a BDFL. If people lose their trust in the projects BDFL, they fork the project.

Also, the kernel is really just one part of Linux. Distros include a whole bunch of software they choose to deliver a full OS (hence the Gnu+Linux people). Linus doesn't have control over the OS as a whole, just the kernel.

Edit: Just finished reading the chain, what do you mean the dude did a 180? He expressed frustration that Linux only criticized him, further criticized the issues with the kernel development process, and said he was giving up being part of the kernel.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Idk what bdfl stands for, but the first thought was big daddy fuck lord

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Benevolent dictator for life.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Benevolent dictator for life, but honestly your interpretation gets the same message across.