this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
60 points (94.1% liked)

worldnews

3089 readers
39 users here now

Welcome!

We strive for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!


Rules:


Rule 1: No Further Gaza/Israel war posts

Rule 2: No US internal news/US politics

Rule 3: Editorials, opinions, analysis, blogs, gifs, memes, etc non-serious news sources

Rule 4: Non-English articles require a translation in the post or comments (mark the title with the source language eg. [FR] for French)

Rule 5: Petitions, advocacy, surveys

Rule 6: All-caps titles

Rule 7: Old news (≥ 1-Month-old) articles

Rule 8: Unlabeled NSFW images/videos

Rule 9: URL shorteners

Thank you.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBatz@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The biggest issue with these topics is the lack of trust toward the scientists, or even forgetting that there are any scientists working on the project. It's not as if the prime minister woke up to the idea of dumping nuclear waste into the ocean

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because Capitalists have been using scientists to push their agenda for almost a century now this is an article about the oil and tobacco industries using the same scientists.. If you google scientists supporting fossil fuels you can find way too many other examples as well.

[–] TheBatz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's a fair argument. Although I am against making a generalization, especially since the IAEA who greenlighted the operations seems to be fairly independent

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, I don't assume that they didn't do their diligence. I am just explaining why people wouldn't automatically trust things solely because they have the title "scientist", even it is a group of them.

[–] vashti@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

The thing is that TEPCO and the Japanese government had such a conspiracy of silence going on, and such an insistence that their implementation of nuclear power was safe, that nobody believes a word they say - nor should they.

Myself, I think the release is probably safe. But I'm not an expert, and I'm not really qualified to read scientific studies (which is an important thing to know about yourself), and I wasn't lied to by the people now telling me this is totes harmless about how Fukushima was totes harmless until oh, it wasn't.

Shit's complicated.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Correction: capitalism has been using scientists work. Scientists are people who need to eat too. They don't have they word to say.