Scheme

130 readers

2 users here now

A community for things relating to the scheme programming language https://www.scheme.org/

Looking for mods, if you want to mod the community feel free to dm Ategon

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Vacant@programming.dev

The Perfect Programming Language (mov.im)

submitted 1 year ago by themaniacschemer@programming.dev to c/scheme@programming.dev

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An article (by me) that dives deep into each one of Scheme's unique and distinctive features, and how they all combine together to produce a language with tremendous expressive power, providing support for any arbitrary runtime semantic conceivable, and infinite extensibility.

Also takes a philosophical approach to justifying the need for such an incredibly powerful and expressive programming language, for a practical programmer. It ties together the theoretical power and extensibility of Scheme with the principles of Domain Driven Design.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] themaniacschemer@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I must of course address the elephant in the room: The choice of the word "perfect" to describe Scheme.

I gave a definition for what I perceive is perfection: The impossibility of reaching a limit in the extension of the language in question. In plain English, this means Infinite extensibility. And what I mean is that Scheme is perfectly extensible. The choice for this language comes from the definition of the word "perfect": completed; not defective nor redundant; having all the properties or qualities requisite to its nature and kind; without flaw, fault, or blemish. That describes how extensibility is in Scheme, and that's how I judge Scheme.

I don't mean to say that any other language is by definition not perfect because Scheme is, or any such crap. Any language that's infinitely extensible will also receive the praise of being perfect, by my definition. And my view of perfection has nothing to do here with subjective beauty or perceived elegance; it's a precisely defined term rooted in objective criteria (provided in that article).

I hope that clears up the one serious misconception that may arise by reading this article's title. I am not judging based on sentimental opinions; I'm being perfectly rational and logical here. Treat this article as such.