430
Uber Eats undercover: Delivering your food for $1.74 an hour
(www.thestar.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
430 points (96.7% liked)
Technology
60314 readers
354 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The problem with that law is many that qualify to deliver now, wouldn't if they were considered employees, and a lot of homeless/near homeless deliver instead of begging.
That argument is just a regurgitation of the propaganda that these people bought into. You can't possibly know what would have happened because the law was voted down. I think that if those companies severely restricted the number of drivers they allowed, quality of service would decline and they would end up losing market share. In the end, there probably are somewhat fewer drivers, but those drivers are guaranteed to be making at least minimum wage plus mileage and access to health insurance.
No, that's my personal experience and prediction knowing how shit corporations are. Yeah, in an idealized world we'd all be w2 workers, but there also wouldn't be homeless and there's be easy to enter programs to make money if you are.
But until those programs are in place you're risking the jobs of tens of thousands of people without other options. For no reason.