this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
-10 points (44.0% liked)

Linuxsucks

210 readers
159 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!).
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you *it's ok to report rule violations

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
madthumbs@lemmy.world
Uschteinheim@lemmy.world
-10
Why Linux users should be wary of M4A (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 month ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/linuxsucks@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

With M4A you don't need to worry about insurance and billing, you're just doing one thing, and one thing well. You can free up so many resources just by removing the insurance and billing packages.

[โ€“] highball@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

This is actually how things were prior to HMO's.