1447
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ado@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"It's easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable" is a common argument; if it's really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

[-] ZiemekZ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One of the very few phones like this.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1447 points (97.1% liked)

> Greentext

7464 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS