this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
226 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

76072 readers
4603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Use Signal or XMPP+OMEMO or anything else.

Mandate social media to expose an open API and use the chat function with an OTR plugin.

The solutions are all old.

It's just interesting how it all went from promotion of corporate surveillance to comms protection when supposed corporate shills won the election.

[–] asudox@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It would be great if XMPP were to rise again.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It went out of popularity for a reason. I'd love a new protocol with XMPP's mistakes fixed.

BTW, OMEMO highlights one of those - it's not as good as Signal by which it is inspired. Basically no metadata protection, which means that it's as good as OTR with multiple devices.

Some kind of Signal with federation (and good clients, not like signal-desktop) would be interesting. Maybe even p2p with some kind of relays (like in NOSTR) for history, offline messages, some kind of Telegram channels and such.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Look into Session. I didn't like it but it checks your boxes

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lol no. I like being able to send messages to someone who isn't online at the same time

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting xmpp can't do that? XD

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Asynchronous communication is dependent on both users servers software and config. And that's exactly why XMPP is disused.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's an option you can disable in server software to disable message storage. Why stop at this?

XMPP can't federate because there's an option for disabling that too! 😧

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Its the other way around. Asynchronous communication was a feature added later in some software. By default it didn't have it

I'm saying it'd a deal breaker if all users dont have asynchronous communication.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

You're technically correct but that was two decades ago. Novadays virtually every featured server passes the Conversations compliance test which continuously checks if all modern features are enabled.

[–] foxitixation@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago