733
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by moral_quandary@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

It appears that in every thread about this event there is someone calling everyone else in the thread sick and twisted for not proclaiming that all lives are sacred and being for the death of one individual.

It really is a real life trolley problem because those individuals are not seeing the deaths caused by the insurance industry and not realizing that sitting back and doing nothing (i.e. not pulling the lever on the train track switch) doesn't save lives...people are going to continue to die if nothing is done.

Taking a moral high ground and stating that all lives matter is still going to costs lives and instead of it being a few CEOs it will be thousands.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I’m of the opinion that shooting CEO’s that make decisions to deny insurance claims that cost peoples’ lives is the moral high ground.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The problem isn't that they deny claims, the problem is that they exist in the first place. The industry has evolved from a nice-to-have to a downright necessity, because its existence has changed the entire concept of market economics.

The existence of an industry of competitive, for-profit middle-men means that scrutiny must be applied to all charges to increase margins. This ends up spiraling the cost of care up to the point where it's unobtainable without it, necessitating its existence.

Tying it to employment also means that changing jobs can be a significant risk to the health and wellbeing of your entire family. Even worse, your employer cutting costs by changing providers could do the very same at any point.

The combination of "money is speech" with this means that their profits must also be "invested" in protecting potential profits, by means of government lobbying.

This is why for-profit health insurance industries are unsustainable. The only solution is a non-profit entity in the marketplace that has such a large risk pool that the level of scrutiny isn't necessary because they have the negotiating power to drive costs down to acceptable levels. This is government single-payer or Medicare-for-All. There is nothing saying it can't compete with private insurance, but private insurance should not be necessary for life.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
733 points (91.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

30000 readers
607 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS