this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1035 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

10288 readers
847 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1035
Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago

My job uses a data science platform that has a special ai assistant trained on its own docs.

The first time I tried using it, it used the wrong language. The second time I used it, it was hallucinating its own functions, but after looking up the docs I told it what function to use and it gave me code that worked

I have not used it a third time. I don’t think i will.