Greentext

4402 readers

814 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

380

Anon tries programming in Java (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by LiamTheBox@lemmy.world to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

218 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is that why every single application will only work with some ancient version of Java?(usually 8, sometimes 1.6 or 11)

I can’t think of many cases where Java 21 is a drop in replacement, and I don’t think I anyone actually used 17.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's entirely the fault of applications (or more likely their libraries) using internal APIs or JNI. As long as it isn't doing anything screwy with reflection and class loading or using the sun.* packages that aren't part of the language specification, Java bytecode compiled for ancient Java versions will still work on modern versions.