this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1715 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

63009 readers
4156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 114 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They don’t care about Firefox. Chrome is the browser market, they have weakened extensions, they implemented DRM, and here we are.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 144 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Coming to you later… “Your browser violates YouTube’s Terms of Service.”

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This would become an Anti trust suit I would imagine.

[–] Sami@lemmy.zip 72 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They can just phrase it a little differently and argue semantics in front of a bunch of 70 year olds who don't know what a browser is in a hearing or two. Maybe a couple campaign contributions through completely legal channels and that's that. Anti trust enforcement has been falling in the US for decades.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am cautiously optimistic of that new gal heading the FTC, she's preparing suits I to Amazon and Google, so we'll see how that goes

[–] callyral@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could use an extension that changes your user agent but I'm not sure how well that'd work

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have control of Chrome, so they could always implement some kind of API into Chrome to check.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

C-C-C-C-Conflict of interest!

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everybody thought this was OK because Chromium is open-source.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that may help if a group of developers decide to fork it in their own direction.

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, but most people will still use Google Chrome, and good luck getting Microsoft and Opera to switch to the fork. Google will still have full control over Chrome, and the layperson won't understand why a browser that looks the same as Chrome but doesn't work with Google's sites is better.

That's the issue.

[–] intelati@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

Laughs in useragent switch

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They're TRYING, but for now, it would be a user agent extension matter.