117
submitted 2 weeks ago by NENathaniel@lemmy.ca to c/ontario@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm all for biking and reducing car lanes for bike lanes. But the original argument was being passed on the sidewalk (which bikes should not be on, even if there aren't bike lanes) when bike lanes are present right there.

Obviously getting hit by a car is so much worse. No one is debating that. Is this an example of a straw man argument?

Anyways, bikes should not be on the sidewalk and more bike lanes are a good thing.

[-] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Responding specifically to “those bikes zipping past me are just as scary to me as cars are to cyclists”

I do agree that if there’s a safe bike lane, cyclists should be using it, not the sidewalk. I wouldn’t classify all bike lanes as ‘safe’ tho

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Oh sorry. I didn't think that's what you were getting at. I agree at least to an extent. When biking, I only ever go on the sidewalk if I'm getting off my bike to cross at a light or something.

But yes, many bike lanes are not safe, and the amount of people who either don't know, or don't care about the proper etiquette of bikers in those lanes is frankly terrifying. Not to mention road rage when you're on a bike and someone is in a vehicle.

Obviously there is much more thought that has to go into new planning of bike lanes and such.

(Sorry, my other reply may have been somewhat confrontational, wasn't my intention).

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
117 points (99.2% liked)

Ontario

2185 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS