this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
165 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

2957 readers
180 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

everyone could do it

…proceeds to not do it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't think Stonehawk is a better name than LibreWolf? Kind of proving my point there.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I don't, does that also prove your point?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the largest problem with librewolf is the difficult pronunciation, I think, just as with forgejo. stonehawk is easy, as is not a terrible name either. maybe "stone" is not terribly interesting, though. but it still seems to be an improvement for me.

what is your take on it? why do you think it's not better?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I just think that they are pretty much same interest-wise, and LibreWolf at least tries to convey some meaning