this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
131 points (89.7% liked)
Futurology
1785 readers
120 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
(Quote by the author of the study himself)
It's a purely mathematical construct that could explain bending of light without mass.
Typical, scientist: "My paper does NOT say THIS". Press: "Scientist claims THIS!"
To be fair dark matter is a purely mathematical construct to explain the presence of gravity without (visible) mass. Certainly dark matter has more credibility than this new idea but hypothetical mathematical constructs make up a good chunk of physics.
Sure, I'm blaming the concerned journalist(s) here. It's rlly scummy to hype up an evidenceless hypothesis like this. Does injustice to both, the scientists and the public.
But per the definition given involving negative mass, it should be "meassurable mass in the presence of exotic matter". Anywho...