Patient Gamers

10292 readers

14 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

cod@lemmy.world

briongloid@aussie.zone

BurntWits@sh.itjust.works

157

Is there a game that you've been very patient for, which turned out to be dissappointing when you finally started playing it? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by verycoolusername@lemm.ee to c/patientgamers@sh.itjust.works

247 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally there are a few games which left me very dissappointed, after hyping myself up for years in certain cases.

Divinity Original Sin: turns out I prefer more streamlined, less packed games (love Pillars of Eternity) and that coop play in a CRPG stresses me out.

Wasteland 2: I actually managed to finish this one but secretly I admit I was hoping for a better Fallout which I didn't really get. New Vegas did the cowboy theme much better.

INSIDE: while the design was cool, it was just a ton of boring, easy puzzles in comparison to LIMBO, its predecessor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mirror´s Edge. 9/10 on Steam. I bought it during the last sales. The gameplay is playing again and again and again the difficult jumps until you make it. It's boring.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 15 points 1 year ago

I recently replayed that game after 10+ years. I think I could count the number of difficult jumps that required more than two attempts on one hand. The game is like $1-2 on a sale and you can beat it in 3 or 4 hours. I thought it was fun, but I could see how it would be disappointing if your expectations were higher than minimal.

Mirror's Edge: Catalyst was much better IMO. Actual story. Decent characters. Free roam. Side quests.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ME has some cool first few levels, and then it barely evolves from that.

[–] Aasikki@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah initially it felt really cool, but got old really fast. It just felt like doing the same thing over and over again.

[+] lordriffington@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I was in it for the parkour; I didn’t really like the combat and kept being forced to fight people.

Part of the charm of the game was to make its combat unwieldy to push people into parkour-ing past/out of each encounter. The whole game was made so that you could finish it without ever picking up a gun.

It sounds like you didn't get far enough to learn this.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

There was one fight against a boss that was a huge pain in the ass because he tackles you just as you exit a door to the roof and if you don't use the right maneuver, blam! you have to restart and listen to his monologue. Again and again and again. Dear gods, it was so bad it's actually the only thing I remember from the game.
Which is a damn shame because it really was revolutionary, the architecture is fantastic, and the parkour is flawless. Even the "you don't have to fight" thing was genuine! I literally did not fight a single guy... until that damn roof, where I suddenly had to learn the parry maneuver the hard way. Shame.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well... the game is designed so that

Combat is optional

And

Combat is so hard you're more likely to do the parkour thing that you're supposed to be doing anyways.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, ME wasn’t for me either.