37
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
30 readers
1 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
So... Pocket change then.
They were fined $1,900 per monitor they sold (at a price of $990) this way.
So the fine was double the price.
That does not sound like pocket change to me.
What do you think would be a reasonable fine?
They clearly meant the fine is such a small amount of money to the company that it won't cause long term change in its practises.
They almost certainly will change their practices when it comes to this specific misrepresentation in Australia. Their ROI for this campaign would be in the negatives, and head office would not be happy with whatever department marketing lead ran this campaign.
Other countries will need to follow suit in providing decent consumer protections if we want to see wider-impacting change though. I would expect this tactic to still be used by Dell in other markets which do not have as robust false advertising legislation and enforcement.
What would be a reasonable fine to you?