556
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
556 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
59147 readers
2199 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If a school provides a device to a student to take home there's two possible outcomes.
They provide a managed device, and with any management tool, there's a way to invade privacy, intended or not.
They provide an unmanaged device and get sued by parents for letting their"innocent snowflake" access unwanted content.
In both instances there's something to legitimately complain about, but I still say the first option is the better one. The problem comes with oversight and auditing on the use of those management tools.
Not to mention that even with the second option of unmanaged devices, invasion of privacy can still occur if students are stupid enough to use the school provided accounts (Google, 365,etc)
What are we monitoring? How kids get dressed, if they pick their nose while using the computer?
Blocking sites does not require on device "monitoring". Locking down a machine does not require monitoring. So why this invasive level of monitoring.
It’s about monitoring what the children are using on the device not turning on the camera and spying on them naked.
In America we’ve had several instances of undisclosed webcam monitoring of children via school issued devices.
But that’s not what the article is talking about.
i am sorry people are using critical thinking and common sense when dealing untrustworthy actors such as a school district and some shiti 3p vendor.
if they peep on your kid, what is your gonna about it? cry to daddy police? 🤡
i guess y'all must in live in a different country lol
Yeah, that's just weird. Either it's a managed device and can be used only with what is pre configured... Or the invasion of privacy is the goal. Creeping on kids... I'm in your PC reading your dm's...
Lol, wtf? Read a book.
There's other ways - write it into the conditions of loan that it's not the school's responsibility to monitor student use when at home.
There are solutions that allow monitoring only on campus - both the monitoring person and the student need to be on-site for the software to contact a licensing server. No server contact=no monitoring.
And never bring 'AI' into it.