this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
513 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

60451 readers
889 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

so that means you can internally flash the bios chip from the os?

would be cool if there were coreboot builds for these platforms, this exploit seems pretty useful

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait yeah can someone explain why this exploit couldn't be used to say rewrite it to support coreboot and turn this into a good thing?

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

because you need the coreboot people to write firmware that can initialise the system, and that probably takes a lot of reverse engineering

I don't know much about this, but I assume there's little to no effort for corebooting on the amd side, I've only seen intel platforms with coreboot

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

There are coreboot AMD projects for the framework laptop