this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
31 points (73.8% liked)

Technology

83411 readers
3136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
31
We Need Positive Visions for AI Grounded in Wellbeing. (thegradient.pub)
submitted 2 years ago by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One conclusion we came to is that it’s okay that we can’t conclusively define human wellbeing.

Is it also ok that they can't define "intelligence"? My guess is yes.

Scientifically wellbeing is pretty well established. These people are either ignorant of basic sociology, etc. Or more likely the standard definitions of wellbeing don't match their needs. They don't actually care about providing for basic human needs like food, shelter, etc. These are just extremely privileged people completely removed from any deprivation and blabbing incoherently on a blog about their own "joy".